Time to revisit Maslow in a “Show Me the Money” World?
Motivating employees at work is an issue confronting academicians, researchers and practicing managers all over the world. Human Resource managers are
• Reevaluating the relevance of traditional motivation theories developed by Maslow and Herzberg, which focus higher set of needs such as self-actualization, in the present day cultural context
• Suggesting suitable changes and developing an alternate theories to understand the intrinsic process of employee motivation
The Fear Greed Theory of Motivation
There are interesting implications for managers and decision makers as they revisit the process of motivation. Thomas Patten, argues that there are just two basic motivators, i.e. greed and fear. Fear-greed motivation theory, as postulated by him, has economic self-interest as its core and is more fitting to what is happening today. In support of his argument, he cites the exchange theory in sociology, public-choice theory of political science and emerging socio-biology, all being focused on self-interest. The recent fall of financial giants, seem to support this contention.
How relevant is Maslow Today?
Greed seems to be emerging as a potent addition in the context of loss of jobs due to economic downturn, rising labour costs and potential reduction of financial services industry coupled with already shrinking aerospace and weapon markets, all causing widespread fear among working class. Well-paid jobs seem to be increasingly perceived as means for providing a secured and gratifying existence. A secured existence reduces fear. The more is fear reduced, the greater is one’s feeling of security.
The proposition is thought provoking in the current context -
• What truly motivates employees- is it greed or self-actualization?
• Are the motivational theories of Maslow and Herzberg based on self-actualization enough to understand the work motivation process today?
• If the answer to the previous question is no, is there an alternate framework to help practicing managers understand behavior of employees and the motivation process
Show me the money: Is it all that it takes?
It is only in the past decade that the importance of rewards – money, in particular, has been recognized. Organizational Behavior Expert, Lawler seems to support this, “A great deal of evidence exists to suggest that pay was important to employees and that it could motivate them, yet it has been systematically ignored or distorted”.
The generalization in relating greed seems to be justified in workers exhibiting consistent behaviour pattern (asking for more benefits). Work has indeed moved from being a “noble cause” that a man could be intrinsically motivated to engage himself in, to a “commodity” which is accomplished in lieu of money through extrinsic motivation. And as work assume the nature of a commodity, motivation to deliver more than expected has dropped and most enterprises today grapple with quality issues.
Schemes intended to motivate employees by linking compensation to performance and productivity are not alien to us. The assumption is that people perform better if they are provided with higher incentives. Research studies, conducted in various work settings, however support an opposing view. According to Alfie Kohn, “As for productivity, at least two dozen studies over the last three decades have conclusively shown that people who expect to receive a reward for completing a task or for doing that task successfully simply do not perform as well as those who expect no reward at all”.
In an increasingly consumeristic world, where there is demand for higher deemed comfort levels,
• Do most employees find their lower needs are inadequately satisfied?
• Has this led to the temporary disappearance of man’s higher needs, and consequently his desire to reach out towards them?
Even as we look at modifying traditional motivational theories of Maslow and Herzberg, the theory of fear-greed motivation could do with more conceptual rigor and empirical studies. Most importantly, in an emerging economy like India, which is at the crossroads of change, there is growing importance of money as the prime motivator for work. And therefore, the theory of fear-greed motivation could be of interest.
By Dr. Pallab Bandyopadhyay, Head of HR- Asia Pacific, Perot Systems
Building HR Strategy, Managing Culture Design & Change, Strategic Thinking & Alignment
NA
money no doubt an important motivating factor.but there are other factors as well such as values,ethics which do play a role.for instance the employees of south west are not paid that high but thanks to the work environment they deliver the goods..greed motivates but beyond a point proves to be disastrous for the society as a whole eg.,subprime crisis
Its all about money. The present Indian generation has tasted success outwardly. Outward is obvious; the senses pour out naturally; its easy to see others; its more convieneient to judge others. The vibrant economy; the global village has added to thier glory; the lower needs apparently seem to provide more satisfaction; where is the time and more importantly inclination for higher needs; when the judgement day arrives we will see; Do not disturb- the placard to soul.
It is an interesting argument. In the first place, the hierarchy of Maslow’s needs is in doubt regards to its validity. All needs can exist simultaneously and there need not be a hierarchy at all.
But without fulfilling basic needs or security needs, going for self-actualization would be commonsensically wrong as this would not cater to the employee masses.
So in today’s world, things do start with money but wont end with it.
Though Money is a big motivator. But money alone cannot motivate. Maslow’s theory is correct .. and is addressing a larger audience. But the context we refer to is IT/ITES/MBA crowd and hence the theory needs customization.
Secondly, even today only 15-20% employees change jobs for money and that also because he sees company pays more to new employees with almost similar education and experience than him. So only viable option is to Jump …